The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Welcome to English speakers willing to discuss politics with Quebeckers.

The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Delenda » Jeu Avr 10, 2008 9:01 am

Quebec's oppressive war on Quebecers

By Robbie Manis, Special to The Suburban


Given Quebec’s reticence to continue supporting its population base via immigration, Mario Dumont came up with the novel idea of inviting some of the hundred of thousands of former Quebecers back to the fold after their sojourns in Toronto, New York, Vancouver, Los Angeles, Calgary and any other greener pasture which they have inhabited for the last bunch of years. While this is a noble gesture on the part of Mr. Dumont, I feel that it would only be fair to inform these emigrants of the relentless war that Quebec is presently waging on Quebecers. Specifically, Montrealers are the subject of a profound assault initiated by their trusty provincial and municipal governments. While the assault is neither physical nor militaristic, the carnage they seek to wreck on Montrealers’ finances and overall well-being is significant. Let me illustrate with the following examples.

Montreal was a vibrant and proud world class city in the 1960s. Thirty-plus years of manufactured political instability have caused irreparable damage to the city’s financial status and morale. With the endless pre-occupation with separation, we have succeeded in driving away anything that looks like a legitimate taxpayer, be it an individual or a corporation. We have created an environment where an out-flowing brain drain is nurtured and encouraged. We have banished entire industries such as banking and financial services as well as countless corporate head offices and international businesses. Montreal has become a niche player, subservient to the economic powerhouses of Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary. As a result, the remaining tax base has shrunk markedly to the point where the diminished population is subject to soul-destroying income taxes that lead the North American rankings by a wide margin. Of course, the problem then gets compounded. Having created a political environment that drives away corporate investment and the related employment, we then resort to massive doses of corporate welfare to entice the businesses to come back. Again, the beleaguered middle class taxpayer foots the bill for such largesse.

Montrealers like to mock the excessive cost of living in Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver. It makes us feel better about the salary discount that equivalent positions receive in Quebec. But the reality is that after tax, there are no real savings to living in Quebec. Let us consider a fictional Quebec couple where each earns $50,000 per year. This couple will pay $5,500 more in annual income tax than will a similar couple living in Ontario. That is a tidy $458 per month that never sees the light of day. And this figure probably understates the discrepancy since your Quebec tax return includes phantom income that is not considered income by the rest of the country. Moreover, deductions available to all other Canadians are often and rudely denied on the Quebec return. While I am at it, how annoying is it to double your work to prepare two income tax returns per person whereas every other province and territory manages to harmonize with Feds to simply require one return per person? Yet another part of the price of being distinct.

Not content to stuff its coffers with ungodly income taxes, Quebec and its cities with their bloated administration see fit to max out on property taxes that well outpace the national averages. By my estimate the Montreal agglomeration and related committees must employ up to 10 times the amount of administrators that similar cities in North America do. All of this costs money — yours and mine. Of course, the fact that we employ a unionized blue collar brotherhood that works at the pace of the flesh eating disease (an inch an hour) does not help to maximize the efficiency of this particular batch of tax dollars.

In addition to being shell-shocked by the aforementioned taxes, we also have the privilege of leading the league with the highest gas prices in North America. This is due to the imposition of special taxes added to the price of a litre of gas. While the poor middle class consumer is suffering from all-time high gas and heating oil prices, the government makes out like a bandit since higher core gas prices lead to higher taxes exigible payable thereon. As much as they lament the toll that high gas prices are having on the U.S. economy, the price that we pay per litre of gas in Montreal is more than 50 percent higher than the national average in the U.S. Not to mention 17 cents higher per litre than comparable prices in Toronto.

Not content to simply gouge us on the cost of gas, the municipal government also forces us to use more gas than is necessary. We hear often about carbon emissions and other posturing and pretense regarding concern for the environment. The city of Montreal even wants to impose an additional tax on anyone left idling their car for more than 12 seconds. Such is their concern for the ozone layer. But, of course, we know that their concern has nothing to do with planet Earth. If they cared at all, they would not mandate that we leave our cars idling unnecessarily when stopped at a red light when all we want to do is turn right. What is the cost of this waste of gas when multiplied by hundreds of thousands of cars per day on the island of Montreal? How about the cost to the environment? Does anyone care? Are Montrealers so significantly deficient in intellectual aptitude that while everyone else in North America can negotiate a right turn on a red light, we cannot? It seems strange but when I am outside the island of Montreal, I manage this complex maneuver just fine.

Our roads and infrastructure are an abomination. Ten minutes after Mayor Tremblay promised no property tax hikes in support of our decrepit roads, my property tax bill arrived with a very special road tax. While I now have the pleasure of donating additional dollars to the city, the roads appear to be worse than ever. Without even dragging up the tired stories of overpasses collapsing, driving around the city is like entering a slalom course. You can be driving on a deserted road with no car within 50 miles and yet your failure to stare at the pavement in front of you can cause you to write off the value of your car. The holes in the road are the size and depth of beach balls. How many Montrealers have paid the new tax known as pothole-induced-tire-destruction tax. Not to mention the whiplash that these craters can cause when you choose to mind the other cars instead of focusing on the landmines in front of you. Quite simply, not only are the roads in Quebec not paved with gold, they are not even paved.

Have you ever heard of tax being taxable? The concept obviously sounds absurd but it is a well embraced concept in Quebec. If you go to the pharmacy to buy $10 worth of medicine for your sick child, the five percent GST comes to 50 cents. The QST is calculated on not just the price of the medicine itself but also the GST you have generously donated to the Feds. Accordingly, the QST at its pretend rate of 7.5 percent actually amounts to 79 cents. While the Quebec government likes to advertise its tax rate as 7.5 percent, once you add on the lecherous portion that taxes the GST itself, the real QST rate is around eight percent. Just a little more deceptive fun with numbers that the Quebec government uses to amuse and abuse us.

All the above is just a sampling of the way we get systematically raped by our esteemed governments. This last point goes to the heart of the war on our sensibilities. I have lived in Montreal for 32 of my 40 years. (and if Quebec is so bad, why don't you get the hell out?) I was educated entirely in Montreal and had the privilege of growing up in the post-Bill 101 era. Accordingly, I speak French. I often work in French and I frequently socialize in French. I play hockey with a linguistically mixed group of guys. Sometimes we speak French and sometimes we speak English. Generally, the conversation defaults to the language in which the highest number of participants are proficient. But one thing is clear, nobody cares about the language issue.

In 32 years in the province I can think of one occasion of actually encountering linguistic bitterness. My conclusion is that the people do not care about this manufactured divide. It is only the politicians, so desperate to get their tired names in the newspapers that they try to divide and conquer the “two solitudes”. Quebecers, more than anyone else in North America, are uniquely positioned to reap the benefits of bilingualism. In a competitive world where unique skills differentiate us, it is reprehensible that the pompous politicos seek to promote linguistic divide instead of encouraging the expansion of linguistic capabilities. I do not think I have yet met a francophone whose sensibilities are genuinely offended by a bilingual street sign or commercial advertisement. Do we have to perpetuate this childish notion that makes us a laughingstock in North America forever? Is there no statute of limitations on foolishness?

So there you have it. I have tried to summarize all that these former Quebecers could expect to realize in the very unlikely scenario that they accept Mr. Dumont’s invitation. In reality, all I will have accomplished as a result of this essay is to increase the west-bound traffic on the 401.

2008-04-09 10:23:23

:con:
" Le mot «méprisant» ne suffit pas pour décrire ce que j'ai rencontré jusqu'à date" - Thomas Mulcair, à propos de Dion
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Delenda
Ministre
 
Messages: 8383
Inscription: Ven Oct 22, 2004 11:41 am

Re: The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Guêpe » Jeu Avr 10, 2008 9:50 am

(and if Quebec is so bad, why don't you get the hell out?)


Because most people don't abandon the place you call home because you aren't happy with the politics of it. They instead try to engage in civil society and try to change it.
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Guêpe
Citoyen
 
Messages: 76
Inscription: Mer Avr 12, 2006 10:07 pm
Localisation: Ottawa

Re: The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Polémix » Jeu Avr 10, 2008 1:44 pm

So you are saying that for one who's home is Québec, the ROC is not.

That is nice to hear from the ''others'' .. :wink:
Polémix

Vous n'êtes pas contre l'hypocrisie, vous n'êtes pas contre la corruption et vous n'êtes pas contre la mafia : Vous êtes contre la souveraineté !
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Polémix
Ministre
 
Messages: 8778
Inscription: Lun Juin 25, 2007 10:33 pm
Localisation: Lanaudière

Re: The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Guêpe » Mer Avr 16, 2008 1:30 pm

Polémic a écrit:So you are saying that for one who's home is Québec, the ROC is not.

That is nice to hear from the ''others'' .. :wink:


HA! Nice try...

I'm from south western Ontario and moved to eastern Ontario. Seeing as I moved to the capital for school and have stayed for employment reasons, I consider myself to have moved away from home. That's without consideration of even moving out to west to Alberta or BC or somewhere like that...where I TOTALLY would have moved away!
Ontarien pour le Oui…le 10 octobre, 2007
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Guêpe
Citoyen
 
Messages: 76
Inscription: Mer Avr 12, 2006 10:07 pm
Localisation: Ottawa

Re: The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Delenda » Jeu Mai 08, 2008 9:29 am

Le torchon tente de prouver l'infériorité des francophones...

Opinion — National education tests show stark disparity

By Jim Wilson, The Suburban




Just a few months ago, it was revealed that Quebec’s French public schools had the highest dropout rate in Canada. Although there could be a myriad of explanations to account for this state of affairs, it is generally agreed that academic failure is a major factor in a student’s decision to quit school. With this in mind it comes as a great surprise to read the headline that, according to the report coming from Canada’s Council of Ministers of Education, “Quebec students score highest marks on national tests.” What could explain this contradiction? Adding to the mystery was that those sterling results only applied to Quebec’s francophones; the province’s English speakers fell below the national average. Curious too, is that anglophones have a far higher high school graduation rate than francophones.

A closer look at the results reveals some interesting facts. In the appendix to the report, the data on student exemption to the tests is quite startling. The parental refusal to allow the child to take the tests averaged less than one percent for the provinces except Quebec. In this province’s French schools, that rate hit an astronomical 27.4 percent. Did this have an effect on the statistical validity of the results? Quebec’s English refusal rate was high too, standing at 19 percent. In addition the proportion of students tested from Quebec’s French sector was very low when compared to those from English schools. Although approximately 20 percent of English students were tested, less than two percent of French students wrote the tests. Those with a passing familiarity with statistics know that the smaller the sample size, the greater the room for misleading conclusions. Moreover, and more importantly, how was such a small sample group selected? Was it a true reflection of the French-speaking student population?

Another criteria missing from this report is the oversight which would have recognized that an overwhelming majority of English students in this age range spend half their schooling studying in French. A language proficiency test should have been conducted in both languages to provide a fair comparison of educational achievement.

Notwithstanding these arguments it seems that English students in Quebec are falling behind their Canadian counterparts in English mother tongue and mathematics. Could it be connected to the absence of textbooks in English schools? If it is, there seems no urgency in addressing this concern. In a recent interview on 940 Montreal, Dennis Trudeau questioned Geoff Kelley, the anglophone MNA, about his efforts in this area. Had he raised the matter with the minister? Yes, was the response. In the National Assembly itself, inquired Trudeau. Well, no, admitted Kelley. Then where, asked Trudeau. “Oh I met her in the hall,” answered Kelley. For all we know, she could have been on her way to the washroom. It is certainly difficult to accept that this is an appropriate way to represent the community.

Of course, the Quebec English Schools Boards Association, [QESBA] the alleged voice for English education, has taken its usual supine stance. Not only have they avoided doing anything regarding textbooks, but they seem unable to provide any explanation regarding the English students’ performance. The Department of Education has suggested that the high flying French students’ marks were due to Quebec investing heavily in early childhood education. It is difficult to take this farfetched view seriously, for that would mean that anglophones are not as involved to that same degree in early education as francophones.

The philosophical underpinning for equalization payments is that they provide equality for all Canadians. If these academic results are to be taken at face value, it becomes evident that something has gone awry, and that federal funds have been diverted from their target, for the results demonstrate a performance disparity. It is ironic that in this scenario, Quebec nationalists for once, cannot claim that francophones are treated as second class citizens, but imagine the uproar if the roles had been reversed. The opposition would have hardly been content to ask discreet questions to the minister in the hallways of the National Assembly.

In a recent letter to The Suburban from Pearson commissioner Joe Zemanovich, it was pointed out that even as a commissioner, he had no idea where the federal transfer payments were going. Are they being siphoned off for non- educational activities? Do any of our representatives know? If they do know, then tell us, and if they do not, what are they doing about it?

There is yet another twist to this tale. According to these results, English Quebec Grade 6 students are below average in their grasp of their mother tongue. Fortunately they must make stunning strides through high school, because based on the last available statistics, 94 percent of English students pass their mother tongue provincial examination in Grade 11. So, although they are supposedly below average in elementary school, virtually every student achieves a pass in high school. As is so often in Quebec, we are being asked to believe two contradictory things at the same time.

Maybe the cynic could consider that the government has succeeded in placing a double burden on English students. First, only the English students are expected to succeed in the two official languages, and second, it has given the inept QESBA the job of running their system.

Jim Wilson was the former president of the Pearson Teachers Union.

2008-05-07 10:50:22
" Le mot «méprisant» ne suffit pas pour décrire ce que j'ai rencontré jusqu'à date" - Thomas Mulcair, à propos de Dion
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Delenda
Ministre
 
Messages: 8383
Inscription: Ven Oct 22, 2004 11:41 am

Re: The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Delenda » Ven Mai 23, 2008 12:01 pm

Ricky Blue — English like me




When the Bouchard-Taylor Commission finally tables its report at the end of the month, there is one solution to the “reasonable accommodation” problem it will not suggest: Repeal Bill 101.

I guess it’s too obvious.

Bill 101 divides the citizens of Quebec into two unequal groups: those who speak English and those who speak French. And it enforces different rights for each group.

By diminishing and regulating unilingual anglophone participation in any form of cultural, commercial and social life in Quebec, it ensures that these unfortunate citizens can never grow to their full potential.

It cuts the English-speaking community off at its roots just as a gardener would to create a Bonsai tree, leaving a tiny shrunken facsimile of what it could and should be.

Even though the English language is a key to open the door into the international business community and the rest of North America, Bill 101 doggedly insists that the English language is the enemy of Quebec, and by definition those who practice it — Quebec’s unilingual anglophones.

Just to refresh your memory about how institutionalized discrimination against anglophones is in Quebec, think back to last November when Le Journal de Montréal sent a reporter to downtown Montreal cleverly disguised as a unilingual anglophone.

Although most of the stores would not allow the anglophone to work in her own language in her own home town (which in any other jurisdiction would be a violation of her basic human rights), Le Journal implied that Quebecers should not be satisfied until the level of discrimination was total.

Compare this with the famous book from the Sixties called Black Like Me. That was the story of a white reporter disguised as a black man who went into the American South to investigate discrimination.

In Black Like Me, the scandal was that the reporter was always discriminated against solely on the basis of his perceived race. In the Le Journal de Montréal report, the scandal was that the reporter was not always discriminated against on the basis of her perceived language.

This discrimination is so much part of Quebec culture that even the Liberal MNAs that anglophones dutifully send to the Quebec Parliament to represent them every election are mute, and have been since Clifford Lincoln’s magnificent but futile “rights are rights are rights” speech 20 years ago.

Even though the idea that one salesclerk speaking English in a store in downtown Montreal will threaten the right of someone to speak French in a hermetically sealed French-speaking environment in another region of Quebec is preposterous.

But now Bill 101’s unintended consequences have come home to roost. Because of the socially acceptable and state sponsored intolerance practiced in Quebec since 1977, the anglophone population has been greatly reduced.

And whereas anglophones come from the same Judeo-Christian and liberal democratic background as Franco-Quebecers, they now have to be replaced with more exotic immigrants who, in many cases, have very different racial, cultural and religious backgrounds, and very different values and beliefs.

Which has created the well publicized difficulties of cultural assimilation we now call “reasonable accommodation.”

Repealing Bill 101 to entice more English speakers to Quebec and keep the ones that are still here would be one step towards solving this problem; because, with the exception of language, anglophones and francophones are culturally homogeneous. And in this case “the other” you know might be more easy to assimilate than “the other” you don’t know. But the Bouchard-Taylor report will say nothing about it. It’s just too obvious.

2008-05-21 09:50:59
:evil:
" Le mot «méprisant» ne suffit pas pour décrire ce que j'ai rencontré jusqu'à date" - Thomas Mulcair, à propos de Dion
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Delenda
Ministre
 
Messages: 8383
Inscription: Ven Oct 22, 2004 11:41 am

Re: The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Delenda » Ven Juil 18, 2008 2:37 pm

Opinion — What is the Canadian 'nation?'

By Allen E. Nutik, Special to The Suburban




The ceremonial and often political speeches at the recent 400th anniversary founding commemoration in Quebec City reveal some common truths that most Canadians cannot bring themselves to admit.

The Prime Minister of France, François Fillon, referred to Quebec as a “country” during at least two instances, but later clarified that “pays” has a wider meaning in French, and said he should have said “nation".

Indeed, Filion should have been much more circumspect in his choice of words, just as Charles de Gaulle never should have uttered at Montreal city hall in 1967, “Vive le Quebec Libre.” But they both definitely articulated incendiary words, whether they meant to or not, and that is the stuff of history books and op-ed speculation.

The misspoken word of the French Prime Minister is code for one of Canada’s greatest unspoken truths.

Thanks to Canada’s long slide to decentralization and the constant appeasement of Quebec nationalist demands in the pursuit of maintaining the façade of a strong Canadian federation, Quebec has all but separated from Canada many years ago.

As long as the Canadian cash keeps coming, along with regular transfers of federal powers, and the right to opt out of national programs so long as it suits the Quebec agenda, the tenuous status quo and the fiction of the Canadian federation will continue to remain intact.

But then, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and no less the Parliament of Canada has conferred the recognition and designation of the “Québécois Nation” on the people of Quebec, while remaining mute on the status of the more than one million anglophone, allophone, and other minority Quebecers who are clearly not part of this identified nation in Quebec nationalist terminology.

Notwithstanding that Canada is constitutionally obligated to render services to its citizens in English and in French (a fact which we at Affiliation Quebec fully support), is it not disingenuous for Canada to pursue a policy of nationwide institutional bilingualism while Quebec has promulgated its own French only, unilingual society?

But the most important question now left to Mr. Harper and Parliament, having already identified but not defined the “Québécois Nation” is: what is the Canadian nation? What is it other than a place of birth or the acquisition of Canadian citizenship papers or passport that otherwise distinguishes the rights and obligations of being Canadian?

Is a sense of patriotism or a true belonging as a full participating citizen of Canada, part of the package? What acts or feelings comprise this unrecognized Canadian patriotism? And if, indeed, it does exist and we hope it does, how would we know if we could recognize it if and when we were lucky enough to observe it?

One fact is certain; we see precious little of Canadian patriotism in Quebec at any time, and we saw none of it at all during the Fête de la St Jean Baptiste (oops…. La Fête Nationale). Come to think of it, we do not see much of it clearly displayed anywhere else in Canada, either.

On Canada’s national day of celebration this past July 1, one would have expected federal members of Parliament to participate in the Canada Day parade in downtown Montreal, or someone from the federalist Quebec Liberal Party, at very least one or all of the four English members of the Quebec National Assembly. Alas, the only Quebec politician present was the lonely leader of Affiliation Quebec, not that anyone noticed… or even cared.

What about a professed and avowed affinity for the destruction of Canada through open support for separatism of Quebec or Alberta or British Columbia? In some democratic countries, such feelings of separation are considered to be treasonous; in Canada, we regret to observe, such feelings are openly tolerated, and the courting of holders of such divisive thoughts is common practice in national politics.

Take the case of former conservative but now Liberal MP Garth Turner who created headlines recently, and incurred rebuke from all parties for his blog and comments on separatists.

According to Garth, “The issue is a single sentence in my last post in which I drew comparisons between those who wish to separate from Canada, whether they live in Quebec or Alberta. I called such separatists, who put regional and self-interest ahead of the national cause, “self-aggrandizing, hostile, me-first, greedy, macho, selfish and balkanizing". Worse, Turner called them “losers".

That statement about separatists in Canada, is a self evident truth as large as the elephant in the room, the one you can smell, but which you must pretend you cannot see. And certainly, political correctness requires that the willful and would- be destroyers of our country must never be derided.

Turner’s Liberal leader, Stéphane Dion, author of the Clarity Act, and apparently on record as having said of Quebec’s clearly discriminatory language law, “Bill 101 was a great Canadian law", demanded an apology.

Environment Minister John Baird urged Liberal leader Dion to “rein in” Mr Turner. Baird said Turner’s blog is “stirring up a hornets’ nest” of past unity problems in eastern Canada. Indeed!

That is another truth; referring to the urgency neither to disturb nor to criticize the enemies of Canada, because one man’s enemy might be the Prime Minister’s intended voter in the quest for a majority government, or a future MP from Quebec.

Regretfully, political and historical truths in Canada are often difficult to discern.

Allen E. Nutik is Leader of Affiliation Quebec, a political party formed to represent the full rights and interests of loyal Canadians living in the Province of Quebec. Website: http://www.affiliationquebec.ca.
" Le mot «méprisant» ne suffit pas pour décrire ce que j'ai rencontré jusqu'à date" - Thomas Mulcair, à propos de Dion
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Delenda
Ministre
 
Messages: 8383
Inscription: Ven Oct 22, 2004 11:41 am

Re: The Suburban, pire torchon anti-québécois

Messagede Polémix » Ven Juil 18, 2008 4:01 pm

..As long as the Canadian cash keeps coming ..

Yep, the real Canadians of Québec keep paying the anglo-federal government 1.5 billions a month for les than 8 billions equalization per year.

.. Notwithstanding that Canada is constitutionally obligated to render services to its citizens in English and in French (a fact which we at Affiliation Quebec fully support), is it not disingenuous for Canada to pursue a policy of nationwide institutional bilingualism while Quebec has promulgated its own French only, unilingual society?

And Québec is more bilingual and the RoC is more unilingual.

.. What about a professed and avowed affinity for the destruction of Canada through open support for separatism of Quebec or Alberta or British Columbia? In some democratic countries, such feelings of separation are considered to be treasonous; in Canada, we regret to observe, such feelings are openly tolerated, and the courting of holders of such divisive thoughts is common practice in national politics.

Ha ! Those days when torture was common practice, it was so much fun.
:con:

.. Regretfully, political and historical truths in Canada are often difficult to discern.

You bet ! If it was not, us real Canadiens would have ended the anglo control over us a long time ago.
Polémix

Vous n'êtes pas contre l'hypocrisie, vous n'êtes pas contre la corruption et vous n'êtes pas contre la mafia : Vous êtes contre la souveraineté !
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Polémix
Ministre
 
Messages: 8778
Inscription: Lun Juin 25, 2007 10:33 pm
Localisation: Lanaudière


Retourner vers Politics in English

Qui est en ligne

Utilisateurs parcourant ce forum: Aucun utilisateur enregistré et 0 invités