


Senech89 a écrit:Bref, un message par personne, votre prédiction sur le résultat global seulement.
Je commence. Voic ce que je pense qui va arriver avec la probabilité que j'y rattache.
1) PQ minoritaire : 60 %
2) PLQ minoritaire : 20 %
3) ADQ minoritaire : 15 %
4) Gouvernement majoritaire : 5 %

William Christian, a professor of political science at the University of Guelph, said Mr. Charest could form a minority government even if the Liberals win fewer seats than the PQ, as long as he could count on ADQ support in the legislature.
"Mr. Charest is Premier. The basic rule is that he remains Premier until he resigns, is dismissed or dies," Mr. Christian said.
There is a precedent in Ottawa for such a scenario. In 1925, William Lyon Mackenzie King won fewer seats than the Conservatives but managed to govern for nearly seven months with the support of the Progressive Party before resigning. "The rule is not the largest number of seats. The rule is really the leader of the party most likely to be able to command a stable majority in the legislature," Mr. Christian said.
Ontario, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Manitoba have all elected minority governments over the past 35 years. And Quebecers have watched minority governments at work in Ottawa since 2004.
"I think [a minority government] could be a good thing because when public opinion is divided or is changing, it’s good to have an Assembly that corresponds to public opinion," Mr. Guay said. "Last time, the ADQ got 18% of the vote but only a handful of seats."
Guy Laforest was president of the ADQ and a candidate in the 2003 election. He remains a party member but has now returned to teaching political science at Université Laval.
He said in an interview yesterday that the affinity between the Liberals and ADQ means the least likely scenario would be a PQ minority government. In the 1995 referendum, Mr. Dumont campaigned in favour of independence, but the ADQ now advocates "affirmation without separation," which is much closer to the Liberals than the PQ. The ADQ also fervently opposes the PQ’s “doctrinaire statism,” Mr. Laforest said.
Complicating matters, however, is the deep personal animosity between the Liberals and ADQ. The ADQ was born after Jean Allaire and Mr. Dumont led a group of dissidents out of the Liberal party in 1992 to protest what they considered overly soft constitutional demands.
"This occurrence was very, very acrimonious, and on both sides it is remembered until this day," Mr. Laforest said. "In the interests of Quebec after March 26, both sides have to move beyond that."

août1991 a écrit:Peu importe ce qui se passe lors des élections, Charest sera PM après le 26. D'après moi, on peut prédire les résultats avec une quasi-certitude.
Voici pourquoi:William Christian, a professor of political science at the University of Guelph, said Mr. Charest could form a minority government even if the Liberals win fewer seats than the PQ, as long as he could count on ADQ support in the legislature.
"Mr. Charest is Premier. The basic rule is that he remains Premier until he resigns, is dismissed or dies," Mr. Christian said.
There is a precedent in Ottawa for such a scenario. In 1925, William Lyon Mackenzie King won fewer seats than the Conservatives but managed to govern for nearly seven months with the support of the Progressive Party before resigning. "The rule is not the largest number of seats. The rule is really the leader of the party most likely to be able to command a stable majority in the legislature," Mr. Christian said.
Ontario, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Manitoba have all elected minority governments over the past 35 years. And Quebecers have watched minority governments at work in Ottawa since 2004.
"I think [a minority government] could be a good thing because when public opinion is divided or is changing, it’s good to have an Assembly that corresponds to public opinion," Mr. Guay said. "Last time, the ADQ got 18% of the vote but only a handful of seats."
Guy Laforest was president of the ADQ and a candidate in the 2003 election. He remains a party member but has now returned to teaching political science at Université Laval.
He said in an interview yesterday that the affinity between the Liberals and ADQ means the least likely scenario would be a PQ minority government. In the 1995 referendum, Mr. Dumont campaigned in favour of independence, but the ADQ now advocates "affirmation without separation," which is much closer to the Liberals than the PQ. The ADQ also fervently opposes the PQ’s “doctrinaire statism,” Mr. Laforest said.
Complicating matters, however, is the deep personal animosity between the Liberals and ADQ. The ADQ was born after Jean Allaire and Mr. Dumont led a group of dissidents out of the Liberal party in 1992 to protest what they considered overly soft constitutional demands.
"This occurrence was very, very acrimonious, and on both sides it is remembered until this day," Mr. Laforest said. "In the interests of Quebec after March 26, both sides have to move beyond that."
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=49b010c9-36b9-4b86-80ba-861a0ccb74b2&k=0
Donc, un gouvernment libéral minoritaire, peu importe le nombre de sièges que le PLQ gagne.
"There ought to be limits to freedom." Dubya Bush


Si Harper n'avait pas l'appui de la Chambre, la GG aurait pu demander à Martin de former un gouvernment.authentic3 a écrit:Pourquoi Harper est PM alors?? Il est minoritaire, alors ça serait Paul Martin qui serait resté PM selon votre théorie?


Marauderz a écrit:JE dirais
PLQ= 35%
Pq = 30 %
ADQ = 30 %
Majoritaire = 5%
Mais je dirais encore plus que le gouvernement qui va etre minoritaire va avoir 1 seul candidat élu de plus que l'opposition et donc va tomber a égalité avec l'opposition quand il va nommer un président d'assemblé

Spock a écrit:PQ minoritaire : 45%
PLQ minoritaire : 55%
Juste pour contredire Sir


TheEggman a écrit:PQ minoritaire = 50%
PLQ minoritaire = 50%





Retourner vers Élection - Québec 2007
Utilisateurs parcourant ce forum: Aucun utilisateur enregistré et 0 invités