www.politiquebec.com

[HIM666]

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians," and most recently, "Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.

[michou]

If you allow me the pun, in the same vein and much closer to the canadian pulse, there is another interesting read which can be found on the Canadian Council of Chief Executives' web site.
The piece dates back to 2004 and let me warn you beforehand, it is a long read. But judging by the preface posted below, I'm sure you'll agree with me that those people aren't messing about with this North American integration process.
As an afterthought, maybe that's what Justin Trudeau meant when he spoke about looking towards the future... hmmmm ?

New Frontiers ---Building a 21st Century Canada-United States Partnership in North America
April 2004

PREFACE

As the heads of leading Canadian enterprises, the members of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives are committed to the support of sound public policy that will strengthen Canada's economy and society. In this context, the way Canada manages its relationships within North America will have a profound impact on our country's future security and prosperity.

The Council was the private sector leader in the development and promotion of the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement during the 1980s and of the subsequent trilateral North American Free Trade Agreement. North American economic integration is now well advanced and irreversible, and in the face of global terrorism, the economic and physical security of the continent have become indivisible.

While the Council's fundamental vision for North America remains trilateral, we believe that to be most effective in addressing some of the key challenges facing our continent today, Canada and the United States must take the lead in developing a new paradigm for cooperation, one that will increase the security of our respective citizens and maximize the ability of our countries to prosper in a world marked by increasingly intense competition among developed and developing countries. Given ever-growing international flows of goods, services, people, investment and ideas, this new paradigm must be based on respect for sovereignty while achieving more effective and mutually beneficial interdependence.

Following more than a year of research and consultation with academics, business leaders and government officials in Canada, the United States and Mexico, we are ready to share some of our thinking. Many important questions remain to be answered, but we hope that the 15 specific recommendations we offer in this discussion paper serve as a point of departure for debate within Canada and the United States and as a spur to action on the critical issues that we have identified.

On behalf of the members of the Council, we are grateful to our readers for your interest in the shared challenges facing Canadians and our North American partners. We look forward to your thoughts and to working with you to ensure growing security and prosperity for all North Americans.

Richard L. George
Chairman

Thomas P. d'Aquino
President and Chief Executive

[Ode au Persil]

NORTH AMERICAN UNION FLAG


Complete report
Building a North American Community
Report of an Independent Task Force
Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales


By the way, Pierre Marc Johnson is a member of the Task Force that wrote this report. What a traitor !

[bobi]

This Deep Integration will see huge areas of government policy "harmonized", including energy, water, drug testing, security, immigration and refugees and more. Fortress America some are calling it, and it's supposed to be in full throttle by 2010.

Here's the American website: Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America.

Btw, a selected bunch of political and business leaders from the three countries met in quasi-secret at Banff last September: Deep Integration Planned at Secret Conference Ignored by the Media.

The Canadian attendance was very heavily biased towards Alberta and the energy industry. There were only a handful of Quebecers present, Pierre-Marc Johnson being one of the chosen few. An odd feature of this story was (still is) the sheer silence of the major media. From what I gather, the local Banff paper was the only outlet to give it some coverage.

On a related note, I can't help but think that this deep integration project has something to do with the recent announcement of defense spending, and Canada's involvement in Afghanistan. Defense spending for high-tech weaponry (required for joint operations with the Americans) fuels military integration with the US, and military integration is the key to other areas of continental integration (such as open borders) that Canadian corporations want. This could explain why Harper extended the mission in Afghanistan for two years and why he's so eager to "win" his own personal war on terrorism: Afghanistan would actually be the proving ground for Canada-U.S. military integration.

IMHO, it's a far better explanation than all the platitudes about freedom, democracy, and the Canadian way.

[AncientWinds]

Personnellement, je serais pour une North American Union à l'image de l'UE !

[michou]

Personnellement, je serais pour une North American Union à l'image de l'UE !

How can a North American Union ever be made in the image of the EU ?
The power play between Canada, Mexico and the U.S is top heavy and lopsided to begin with. We are talking here about two minor world countries "harmonizing" with a belligerent military empire ! The kind of music we'd be made to harmonize with and dance to is obvious.

[EtreDroite]

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Erasing borders with Mexico?

And you believe this?

[KLM]

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Erasing borders with Mexico?

And you believe this?

State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America

Since 9/11, more than four million illegal immigrants have crossed our borders, and there are more coming every day.

What can be said for a man who would allow his home to be invaded by strangers who demanded they be fed, clothed, housed and granted the rights of the first-born? What can be said for a ruling elite that permits this to be done to the nation, and who celebrate it as a milestone of moral progress?

40 minutes d'entrevue avec l'auteur :

http://buchanan.slimhost.com/media/pjb- ... xjones.mp3

[michou]

What can be said for a man who would allow his home to be invaded by strangers who demanded they be fed, clothed, housed and granted the rights of the first-born?

Tit for tat ?

[PouvoirAuPeuple]

There is a party in Canada who is against this shit named security and prosperity partnership, Canada Action Party!





http://video.canadiancontent.net/192158 ... party.html

[PouvoirAuPeuple]

Water and the continental integration!

The Vancouver Sun

Canada's water needs protection from thirsty America: trade lawyer
Chris Cobb, CanWest News Service; Ottawa Citizen

Published: Sunday, April 01, 2007
OTTAWA - Canada urgently needs a clear policy to protect the nation's water resources from privatization, pollution and the creeping demands of the United States, a leading activist told an Ottawa conference Saturday.

"Water needs to be regarded as a fundamental human right and not as a commodity," said international trade lawyer Steven Shrybman. "That is critically important. We need to strengthen sovereignty and negotiate an agreement with the United States that makes it very clear that we will determine when and where Canadian water resources will be used. And that agreement needs to trump any right of any claimant in a trade agreement to assert a claim on Canadian water."

Shrybman was speaking at "Integrate This" a packed weekend conference organized by the left wing advocacy group Council of Canadians to challenge terms of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) between Canada, Mexico and the United States. Opponents of the SPP say its proposed increased economic integration of the three countries is a threat to Canada and Canadians in numerous areas.

Canada.com

[PouvoirAuPeuple]

There was a protest in usa about this stupid project!

The Associated Press April 23, 2007, 2:51PM EST text size: TT
Group protests Mexican truck project
By RON JENKINS

OKLAHOMA CITY

Truckers and anti-illegal immigration forces joined hands at the Capitol on Monday to protest a Bush administration plan to let Mexican trucks haul freight deep into the United States.

The Bush administration announced plans in February to permit 100 Mexican trucking companies to travel beyond the current 20-mile limit in a one-year pilot project.

About 75 sign-carrying truckers and their supporters voiced their disapproval of the project during a rally on the Capitol's south steps.

Supporters included members of the anti-illegal immigration group, the Oklahoma Minutemen Civil Defense Corps., Inc., which is headed by Steve Merrill, former immigration agent.

They heard speakers say permitting Mexican trucks into the country would present safety, security, environmental and economic problems for Americans.

Ron Black, a former radio talk show host, said it is part of an attack on U.S. sovereignty.

"The security of our country is at risk for the benefit of just a few companies," said trucker Jay Michael Riley of Yukon.

Riley and his wife, Claret, a truck driving team, helped found Americans for Safe Highways and Secure Borders, an organization of long haul truck drivers and supporters opposed to allowing Mexican trucks to travel U.S. highways.

Riley said the Mexican government had not developed a database of Mexican truckers as promised under the North American Free Trade Agreement and the proposed NAFTA super highway.

He said allowing Mexican trucks to travel U.S. roads would increase drug trafficking, expose Americans to safety risks, promote illegal immigration and even allow terrorists easy access to the country.

"Where do you think all of those worn out trucks go -- they go to Mexico," said Dan Howard, of Outraged Patriots.

Some speakers said Mexican truckers are poorly paid and allowing them into the United States would put American truckers out of business.

Sen. Randy Brogdon, R-Owasso, spoke to the group, saying he was introducing a resolution urging Congress to reject the idea of the North American Union, composed of Mexico, the United States and Canada.

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financia ... MG10G0.htm

[Guêpe]

...down with manifest destiny!!

[PouvoirAuPeuple]

It seem there is some opposition to this project in the USA!

'North American Union' plan under fire
Americans fear their borders and sovereignty will dissolve
Kelly Patterson, The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Saturday, February 17, 2007
A sweeping accord for the economic integration of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico has unleashed a stormy debate south of the border.

Everyone from national congressmen and state legislators to bloggers and YouTubers are raising the alarm about the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), a plan to harmonize the countries' economic and security practices.

Criticism ranges from measured calls for stronger congressional oversight to hysterical charges that the "treasonous" deal will flood the U.S. with illegal aliens and terrorists.


View Larger Image
Canada's Peter MacKay and Condoleezza Rice of the U.S. will be discussing the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) with Mexico at a meeting in Ottawa next Friday. Critics say the plan is a set of backroom deals that bypass the democratic channels of all three countries.
Paul Darrow, Reuters

Email to a friend

Printer friendly
Font: ****"The deal will weaken the sovereignty of the U.S. It will create a North American Union" similar to the European model, warns Representative Virgil Goode, who, along with six other legislators, has tabled two resolutions opposing the deal in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Canada will be in the eye of the storm next Friday as U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff arrive in Ottawa to meet their Canadian and Mexican counterparts to discuss the accord, in the leadup to a summit of the heads of state in Alberta this June.

The wide-ranging accord lays the tracks for the harmonization of everything from immigration screening and terrorist watchlists to drug-safety and consumer-protection regulations.

The SPP aims "to build a safer, more secure and economically dynamic North America," says Melisa Leclerc, spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day.

But critics argue that the pact, brokered by U.S. President George W. Bush, then-prime minister Paul Martin and Mexican leader Vicente Fox in 2005, amounts to a set of backroom deals that bypass the democratic channels of all three countries to avoid opposition.

Many of the accord's 300-some initiatives affect regulatory issues such as visa-screening rules that are under the control of bureaucrats rather than legislators.

Since January, legislators in six states have tabled resolutions opposing the plan.

"A merger between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico would be a direct threat to the national independence of the U.S. and an eventual end to national borders," says Val Stevens, a Washington state senator who recently filed a resolution opposing the pact.

Officials on both sides of the border strongly deny the charges that they're engineering a North American Union.

"All three governments are sovereign democracies, and the SPP work is the kind of standard intergovernmental diplomacy and co-ordination that occurs all the time on various issues," says U.S. Department of Commerce spokesman Matt Englehart.

Any steps that would require legal changes will be vetted by Congress, Mr. Englehart adds.

The pact aims simply to "promote the safe and efficient movement of people and goods" among the three trading partners, he says.

"That's nice government bureaucratese," scoffs Jerome Corsi, an author and outspoken critic of the pact, pointing to the sheer scale of the project, which involves scores of officials in all three countries.

"You don't need trilateral working groups that report directly to three cabinet secretaries, the National Security Council and the president" to do housekeeping tasks such as cleaning up Lake Erie, he says.

Premiere page

[Jean Sansnom]

If you search the good raison for making independance of Quebec, the new project for the union of North America it a good raison for that.

You not believe that?

My name is Jean not John!

[dirt-bob]

If you search the good raison for making independance of Quebec, the new project for the union of North America it a good raison for that.

You not believe that?

My name is Jean not John!

Unless you guys want independance from the rest of the world it won't change a damn thing to reality. Borders are comming down, trade is from everywhere to anywhere.

That being said Americains are a patriotic bunch and if anyone thinks they will accept a combo crap flag made out of three you have been living in the boonies for way too long.

My name Bond...James Bond

[Jean Sansnom]

The Americans have no choice. The country of Quebec is inescapable for them, we have the essential energy and the water, two elements in their future. They will quickly accept our entrance(entry) to the American union, as they quickly agreed to finance Lévesque and Parizeau in 1964 when the gouvernment Lesage NATIONALIZED the electricity.

My name is Jean not John!

[dirt-bob]

The Americans have no choice. The country of Quebec is inescapable for them, we have the essential energy and the water, two elements in their future. They will quickly accept our entrance(entry) to the American union, as they quickly agreed to finance Lévesque and Parizeau in 1964 when the gouvernment Lesage NATIONALIZED the electricity.

My name is Jean not John!

You guys with the water complex Here's news for ya, the planet is covered with water! So deep we can't even go there yet.

Someone will pump that stuff some day and it will be cheap.

[skidooman]

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Erasing borders with Mexico?

And you believe this?

Indeed.

Lots of Americans are PISSED with illegal immigration, and the latest attempt to resolve the situation died in Congress.

Now, they will accept a customs union with Mexico?

No way, no how.

Not even in Canada.

[Gamma]

The Americans have no choice. The country of Quebec is inescapable for them, we have the essential energy and the water, two elements in their future. They will quickly accept our entrance(entry) to the American union, as they quickly agreed to finance Lévesque and Parizeau in 1964 when the gouvernment Lesage NATIONALIZED the electricity.

My name is Jean not John!

You guys with the water complex Here's news for ya, the planet is covered with water! So deep we can't even go there yet.

Someone will pump that stuff some day and it will be cheap.

It's already being done. And guess what, you have to put a lot of energy in there to make salt water drinkable. Or is it you didn't know we take water to drink it? Either way, you don't make sense at all.

And it's already cheap, pal.

[dirt-bob]

The Americans have no choice. The country of Quebec is inescapable for them, we have the essential energy and the water, two elements in their future. They will quickly accept our entrance(entry) to the American union, as they quickly agreed to finance Lévesque and Parizeau in 1964 when the gouvernment Lesage NATIONALIZED the electricity.

My name is Jean not John!

You guys with the water complex Here's news for ya, the planet is covered with water! So deep we can't even go there yet.

Someone will pump that stuff some day and it will be cheap.

It's already being done. And guess what, you have to put a lot of energy in there to make salt water drinkable. Or is it you didn't know we take water to drink it? Either way, you don't make sense at all.

And it's already cheap, pal.

So why are you so worried that they will steal our water?

Don't you think it takes energy to move water buddy.

[Gamma]

The Americans have no choice. The country of Quebec is inescapable for them, we have the essential energy and the water, two elements in their future. They will quickly accept our entrance(entry) to the American union, as they quickly agreed to finance Lévesque and Parizeau in 1964 when the gouvernment Lesage NATIONALIZED the electricity.

My name is Jean not John!

You guys with the water complex Here's news for ya, the planet is covered with water! So deep we can't even go there yet.

Someone will pump that stuff some day and it will be cheap.

It's already being done. And guess what, you have to put a lot of energy in there to make salt water drinkable. Or is it you didn't know we take water to drink it? Either way, you don't make sense at all.

And it's already cheap, pal.

So why are you so worried that they will steal our water?

Don't you think it takes energy to move water buddy.

I didn't say I was worried. It's just not going to happen.

And to answer you, there's always the pipelines.

[PouvoirAuPeuple]

Good Bye America!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqVKfy400nM

[dirt-bob]

If you want to watch the video without the crap in the background

here's the link...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T74VA3xU0EA

[michou]

Lots of Americans are PISSED with illegal immigration, and the latest attempt to resolve the situation died in Congress.

Now, they will accept a customs union with Mexico?

No way, no how.

Not even in Canada.

I don't agree skidooman. Americans will buy and believe anything if it is properly marketed to them. Case in point, even today, a vast majority of Americans still believe Saddam Hussein and Iraqis had something to do with 9/11. Don't believe Canadians are immune to this kind of brainwashing either. They are not and neither are Québécers.

When our politicians start integrating terms and phrases in their speeches such as the "great North American friendship", then we will know that the branding of a new union and the brainwashing of each nation's population has truly begun. This is when I will start worrying, knowing that the deal has been cut and there is no turning back.

[skidooman]

Lots of Americans are PISSED with illegal immigration, and the latest attempt to resolve the situation died in Congress.

Now, they will accept a customs union with Mexico?

No way, no how.

Not even in Canada.

I don't agree skidooman. Americans will buy and believe anything if it is properly marketed to them. Case in point, even today, a vast majority of Americans still believe Saddam Hussein and Iraqis had something to do with 9/11.

Threats, yeah, they can be marketed alright. They play to the American psyche and stereotypes nicely.

But selling something like a political union with Mexico is quite another story. Even now, you have plenty of Americans believing that UN choppers are preparing an invasion. Some even want to shoot on sight any Mexican caught crossing the border illegally.

[michou]

But selling something like a political union with Mexico is quite another story. Even now, you have plenty of Americans believing that UN choppers are preparing an invasion. Some even want to shoot on sight any Mexican caught crossing the border illegally.

The more reasons for Americans to buy into it then, especially if they are made to believe that living in a "Fortress North America" will protect them from the UN baddies. As for Canadians and Québécers, we have become so goddammed complacent about everything, anyone could basically do anything they wish with us, our resources, our heritage, our nation, as long as it doesn't affect our routine and our bank account too much. Don't know if it's age or what but I'm becoming more and more cynical about "us" North Americans. I once believed Québécers and many Canadians were different, but now I see that we aren't. As long as we are comfortable and that we feel someone else is taking care of our "security", we might as well be wet noodles on a stick, no backbone in sight whatsoever.

[PouvoirAuPeuple]

When our politicians start integrating terms and phrases in their speeches such as the "great North American friendship", then we will know that the branding of a new union and the brainwashing of each nation's population has truly begun.

It has begun since they talk of the north american market and economy!